The League of Narcissistic Professional Women Creating Groupthink Hostile to Quality Research

Often when it comes to setting or changing morals and mores they are thought leaders, change agents or an intellectual vanguard. They help create and spread the groupthink:

Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. Cohesiveness, or the desire for cohesiveness, in a group may produce a tendency among its members to agree at all costs.^[1] This causes the group to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation.

Groupthink – Wikipedia

One way to think about groupthink is that it a wide-scale version of gaslighting. Gaslighting is a very common term used when dealing with narcissists and psychopaths due to how much they enjoy lying as a hobby

Gaslighting is an insidious form of manipulation and psychological control. Victims of gaslighting are deliberately and systematically fed false information that leads them to question what they know to be true, often about themselves. They may end up doubting their memory, their perception, and even their sanity. Over time, a gaslighter’s manipulations can grow more complex and potent, making it increasingly difficult for the victim to see the truth.

Gaslighting | Psychology Today

We have known for decades that every day a newborn or toddler is in non-maternal daycare they are exposed to toxic levels of stress hormones due to their separation anxiety. We also know that children that are not raised by warm mothers also have greater problems over the course of their lives. Excessive daycare is bad in in itself, but so is a woman working a job that makes it harder to warmly engage her children.

A woman that would willingly submit their children to excessive daycare or a lack of warmth is completely lacking in personal integrity and empathy for their own children. Most women are so lacking in empathy and integrity that they intentionally don’t do any proper research into too much daycare because they want to blame their ignorance for their neglect. A childish defense mechanism.

But thanks to groupthink we don’t acknowledge these women for what they are. The fact that they could be considered for any position of public trust, authority or confidence is laughable. Many people find it convenient to think that someone’s personal faults can be ignored if they do a “good job” publicly. That notion should be discarded at a very young age.

There are a lot of everyday abusive and neglectful mothers that have been empowered by well positioned feminist villains. These well positioned women hold the same anti-social values and perform the same anti-social behaviors as everyday emotional deadbeats but they can put on a facade of professionalism as they propagate the feminist groupthink. They help corrupt the institution of motherhood due to their placement in the social instructions of society. They make fact-based conversations into what constitutes too much daycare almost impossible. As high functioning and highly placed narcissist they are enemies to children everywhere.

Narcissistic Women as Researchers

The main everyday villains we have to deal with are neglectful mothers that perform research. A woman that used too much daycare has a track history of being a emotional deadbeat cannot be trusted to do research into maternal neglect and abuse. and Their lifestyles should have make them so compromised as researchers that their bias should be obvious to all.

Out of all the well-placed women out there perhaps these are some of the worst. With the primary research they perform they lay the foundation to lead astray all other researchers that follow them. secondary researchers performing literature reviews are misguided, as are laypeople trying to review their research. And of course, there are plenty of well-educated women out there that know the research supporting too much daycare is trash, but they can just point to the research and then play stupid when called to account.

The Feminist of the American Psychological Association Division 35

One influential group of women that seems to act as lies are morally mandated are the feminist in Division 35 of the American Psychological Association. They “study” the psychology of women but would never think to consider why so many modern women are unempathetic emotional deadbeats. They gaslight other psychologists to change the consensus of what acceptable behavior. The vast majority of their work sees woman as victim when mothers are expected to provide adequate care to their children. Sometimes these women act as researchers and are in our first category as well.

One if the most important distinctions treatment providers make is considering what negative behavior is harmful enough that it behooves intervention. But if you cannot have an honest conversation about what behavior is good or bad then you cannot nominate certain anti-social behaviors for treatment anymore. For example, Passive Aggressive behavior use to be bad enough to lead to a full-blown personality disorder but once we got enough women in the APA it wasn’t seen as a valid a diagnosis anymore. What a strange co-incidence. I am going to write on this later.

No committee or task force of Division 35, the department that deals with the Psychology of Women, addresses maternal abuse or neglect. A massive blind spot for sure; another lie of omission. Their committee on motherhood? Targeted at getting mothers maternity leave and training opportunities and little more.

Not to be too repetitive, but we cannot look to the APA to help us. It is staffed by a bunch of neglectful women that cannot even manage their kid’s bedtime. How can we trust any of their recommendations if they let open feminist in their organization? My next post is going to be on how feminist institutionalize maternal narcissism, so please read that when it comes out.

Neglectful Women as Teachers

In many cities schools are staffed by teachers will college degrees or certifications. These women should be smart enough and have enough initiative to know what constitutes excessive daycare. But as I mentioned in the Arrested Development Section they want narcissistic supply more than they want to be caring and loving mothers. One ways they propagate groupthink and get narcissistic supply at the same time is by misleading and indoctrinating whole classrooms of children, year after year. Their classrooms and the parents of the children they teach are often completely mislead by these altruistic narcissists.

Of course, like many narcissists these women completely lack the ability to self-asses and wonder why they have so much respect and affection at work but not at home with their own children and husband. They have this confusion even when they admit they are deeply resentful to use their social skills in the home.

Narcissistic Female Judges

The idea that that a “professional woman” could remain fair and balanced as a judge is so far from true it is laughable. In order to have a successful legal career to begin with the female lawyer is almost guaranteed to use excessive amounts of daycare. She has hardened her heart to the cries of her own children day in and day out as they were young so she could go to work. Despite her silly robe and gavel she is just like the average neglectful woman.

Guilty of her own maternal neglect she enables the neglect of other women. Sacrificing her children’s wellbeing for the sake of getting her own narcissistic supply she enables other narcissistic women who neglect their children for the same reasons. An female emotional parasite, it is easy for her to enable female financial parasites. She looks at the work of other narcissistic female professionals to justify her decisions. To do otherwise is to admit how she is an everyday evil person.

Generations of narcissistic women have eroded the boundaries of what defines a good woman. A female judge is in common cause with these women. Female judges are hostile to anyone that has broken women’s gaslighting conditioning.  As Birds of a Feather Flock together the narcissistic judge likewise views the responsibilities of motherhood as a unrealistic burden. She would never think to make a ruling or a decision that exposes a “normal” mother to a close evaluation of just how uncaring she is to her own children. These female judges are more than happy to give a woman a divorce discount and not consider it marital waste of financial resources. She turns a blind eye to a host of personality flaws in women as a lie of omission.

What female judge wants to consider she, herself, has been an enemy to children everywhere by ignoring narcissism in women? That would require an adult level of insight most female judges are unwilling to use. Female judges foster a state of maternal narcissism when they consider “what is best for the children.” They give children into the hands of neglectful mothers that should be diagnosed with personality disorders. How will female judges fit in with their peers if they call neglectful and abusive women to account by admitting how degraded motherhood has become?  It would be social and professional suicide for a female judge to admit that most mothers are emotional deadbeats. So they propagate the lie that they act in the children’s best interest.

The mental health issues of generations of children matter nothing to the narcissistic women. If they cannot neglect their children they feel victimized by a unjust society.  If you provide examples of a caring and loving mothers to the narcissist she is deeply angered.  Both the role model and the person that points out the role model have to be opposed and attacked. Examples of good motherhood are offensive to the layers of lies emotional deadbeats have layered on top another. 

The majority of female judges are little more than moral imposters. How can a emotional deadbeat be a good judge? She isn’t a good woman, a good mother or anything along those lines. It should be unthinkable a governor or president would nominate a woman that used excessive daycare to be a judge. You may as well have a rapists sit in judgement over rape trials.

It should be unthinkable for a judge or president to nominate a woman to a judgeship if she cannot admit that women should be stay-at-home mothers during their children’s tender years. A lack of maternal warmth should be a disqualifying trait in a judicial candidate.